Sample opcrf for school heads 2021 excel.Uploaded by

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WebAug 04,  · To download please click this link ��replace.me . Weboffice performance commitment and review form (opcrf) name of employee: name of rater: position: position: office/division: date of review: rating period: january – december . Webschool policies, programs, projects and activities Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school community using any five (5) of the following .
 
 

 

Sample opcrf for school heads 2021 excel.Document Information

 

Communicated the September 6. Satisfactory Occasionally communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to 3 the wider school community to ensure shared understanding and alignment of school policies, programs, projects and activities. Unsatis factory Rarely communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the 2 wider school community to ensure shared understanding and alignment of school policies, programs, projects and activities. Poor Failed to communicate the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the 1 wider school community to ensure shared understanding and alignment of school policies, programs, projects and activities Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school community using any five 5 of the following modalities such as: 1.

Flyers 2. Tarpaulin 3. Video Clip Basic Education Services. Face-to-face Outstanding 5. Online 7. SRC 8. Radio Efficiency. Video Letter of invitation to stakeholders. Very Satisfactory Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider 4 school community using any four 4 of the identified modalities.

Basic Education. Developed and September 6. Quality Development plan guided by the school’s VMG was developed through the Satisfactory leadership of the school and participation of some invited community 3 stakeholders.

Unsatis factory Development plan was developed and implemented through the 2 leadership of the school. Utilized available September 6. Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 2. Managed school data September 6.

Quality Satisfactory Occasionallyperformed management of school data using technology, 3 including ICT to ensure efficient and effective school operations. Unsatis factory Rarely performed management of school data using technology, including 2 ICT to ensure efficient and effective school operations.

Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 Managed gathering and submission of school data to 5 out 6 online systems required by the Department of Education 1. LIS 2. WinS 5 4. Very Satisfactory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 4 out 6 online 4 systems required by the Department of Education.

Satisfactory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 3 out 6 online 3 systems required by the Department of Education. Unsatis factory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 1 or 2 out 6 online 2 systems required by the Department of Education. Very Satisfactory Submitted seven 7 to eight 8 online and three 3 offline required 4 reports indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline.

Timeliness Satisfactory Submitted five 5 to six 6 online and two 2 offline required reports 3 indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline. Submitted three 3 to four 4 online reports and one 1 offline required Unsatis factory report indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline 2. Poor Failed to submit all online and offline required reports indicated in the MOV 1 on or before the deadline 2.

Managed finances September 6. Quality Satisfactory Occasionally managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and 3 issuances in allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation aligned with school plan. Unsatis factory Rarely managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and issuances in 2 allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation aligned with school plan Poor 1 No acceptable evidence presented Basic Education Services.

Managed school September 6. Quality Occasionally managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to Satisfactory policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording, neutralization, 3 repair and maintenance, storage and disposal. Rarely managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to policies, Unsatis factory guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording, neutralization, repair 2 and maintenance, storage and disposal.

Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 Basic Education Services. Assisted teachers in September 6. Localized curriculum is implemented and monitored closely to ensure that Very Satisfactory it makes learning more meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired. Efficiency 4 learning outcome, and directly improves community life.

Localized curriculum is implemented to ensure that it makes learning more Satisfactory meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired learning outcome, and 3 directly improves community life.

Unsatis factory The implemented curriculum is localized to make it more meaningful to the 2 learners and applicable to life and community. Utilized learning September 6. Provided TA to September 6. Quality Occassionally provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment Satisfactory tools, strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to 3 ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes Rarely provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment tools, Unsatis factory strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to ensure 2 accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes.

Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 School assessment results were used to develop learning programs that Outstanding are suited to community, and customized to each learners’ context, results 5 of which are used for collaborative-decision-making. Very Satisfactory School assessment results wre used to develop learning programs that are 4 suited to community. Efficiency Assessment tools were reviewed by the school community and Basic Education Services.

Satisfactory 3 assessment results are shared with community stakeholders. The assessment tools were reviewed by the school and assessment Unsatis factory results are shared with schools’ stakeholders. Poor The assessment tools were reviewed by the school. Implemented September 6. School leaders working individually or in groups, coach, and initiatives to enhance mentor one another to achieve their VMG through the conduct of at least Outstanding strengths and address four 4 need-based professional development initiatives to enhance 5 performance gaps among strengths and address performance gaps among school personnel by school personnel establishing Community of Practice COP.

Leaders frequently undertook training modes that are convenient to them on-line, ofline, modular, group, or home-based and which do not disrupt the regular functions, leaders monitor and evaluate their own learning Very Satisfactory progress through the conduct of three 3 need-based professional 4 development initiatives to enhance strengths and address performance Quality.

Efficiency personnel Satisfactory Conducted two 2 need-based professional development initiatives to 3 enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school Unsatis factory personnel Conducted one 1 need-based professional development initiative to 2 enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school Poor personnel No acceptable evidence presented 1 4. Provided opportunities September 6. SLAC Outstanding 2. Job Rotations 5. Benchmarking 6. Coaching and Mentoring.

Developed and supported personal and professional development of Efficiency. Very Satisfactory individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities 4 in the conduct of any five 5 of the identified HRD initiatives. Developed and supported personal and professional development of Satisfactory individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities 3 in the conduct of any four 4 of the identified HRD initiatives. Implemented a school September 6. Creation of Rewards and Recognition Committee Outstanding 3.

Selection of applicants 5 4. Development of selection criteria per category 5. Sourcing of funds for prizes 6. Satisfactory Conducted at least three 3 of the identified activities 3 Unsatis factory Conducted at least two 2 of the identified activities 2 Poor Conducted at least one 1 of the identified activities 1 5. Built constructive September 6. Occasionally built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues, Satisfactory parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive 3 environment for learners Rarely built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues, parents Unsatis factory and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive environment 2 for learners Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 Outstanding Conducted at least 7 activities with parents and other stakeholders across 5 four quarters with complete required documents.

Conducted at least activities with parents and other stakeholders Very Satisfactory across four quarters with complete required documents. Satisfactory Conducted at least activities with parents and other stakeholders 3 across four quarters with complete required documents. Communicated September 6. Quality Occasionally communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive use of Satisfactory communication platform to facilitate information sharing, collaboration and 3 support.

Rarely communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive use of Basic Education Services.

Unsatis factory communication platform to facilitate information sharing, collaboration and 2 support. Poor No acceptable evidence 1 presented Accomplished, created and utilized five 5 of the following communication platforms: 1.

SMS 2. Initiated partnerships September 6. Very Satisfactory Provided partnership evidences to strengthen support for learner development and school and community improvement Efficiency. Plus Factor Performed related tasks 2. Conducted at least one 1 relevant research in any area within the rating period;.

Efficiency 6. Conducted innovation to address learning gaps; Outstanding 7. Member of district and higher level QA team 9. Ratee Rater Approving Authority. Outstanding 4.

Memo 2. Minutes 3. Photo Documentation 4. Attendance Sheets 5. Proof of Distribution of Print Materials Outstanding 6. Screenshots of Online Announcement 5 7. Tarpaulin 8. Letter Request for Radio Timeslot stamped “Received” 9.

 
 

.Sample opcrf for school heads 2021 excel

 
 

LIS 2. WinS 5 4. Very Satisfactory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 4 out 6 online 4 systems required by the Department of Education. Satisfactory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 3 out 6 online 3 systems required by the Department of Education. Unsatis factory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 1 or 2 out 6 online 2 systems required by the Department of Education. Very Satisfactory Submitted seven 7 to eight 8 online and three 3 offline required 4 reports indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline.

Timeliness Satisfactory Submitted five 5 to six 6 online and two 2 offline required reports 3 indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline. Submitted three 3 to four 4 online reports and one 1 offline required Unsatis factory report indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline 2. Poor Failed to submit all online and offline required reports indicated in the MOV 1 on or before the deadline 2.

Managed finances September 6. Quality Satisfactory Occasionally managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and 3 issuances in allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation aligned with school plan. Unsatis factory Rarely managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and issuances in 2 allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation aligned with school plan Poor 1 No acceptable evidence presented Basic Education Services. Managed school September 6. Quality Occasionally managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to Satisfactory policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording, neutralization, 3 repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.

Rarely managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to policies, Unsatis factory guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording, neutralization, repair 2 and maintenance, storage and disposal. Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 Basic Education Services.

Assisted teachers in September 6. Localized curriculum is implemented and monitored closely to ensure that Very Satisfactory it makes learning more meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired. Efficiency 4 learning outcome, and directly improves community life. Localized curriculum is implemented to ensure that it makes learning more Satisfactory meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired learning outcome, and 3 directly improves community life. Unsatis factory The implemented curriculum is localized to make it more meaningful to the 2 learners and applicable to life and community.

Utilized learning September 6. Provided TA to September 6. Quality Occassionally provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment Satisfactory tools, strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to 3 ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes Rarely provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment tools, Unsatis factory strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to ensure 2 accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes.

Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 School assessment results were used to develop learning programs that Outstanding are suited to community, and customized to each learners’ context, results 5 of which are used for collaborative-decision-making. Very Satisfactory School assessment results wre used to develop learning programs that are 4 suited to community. Efficiency Assessment tools were reviewed by the school community and Basic Education Services.

Satisfactory 3 assessment results are shared with community stakeholders. The assessment tools were reviewed by the school and assessment Unsatis factory results are shared with schools’ stakeholders. Poor The assessment tools were reviewed by the school. Implemented September 6. School leaders working individually or in groups, coach, and initiatives to enhance mentor one another to achieve their VMG through the conduct of at least Outstanding strengths and address four 4 need-based professional development initiatives to enhance 5 performance gaps among strengths and address performance gaps among school personnel by school personnel establishing Community of Practice COP.

Leaders frequently undertook training modes that are convenient to them on-line, ofline, modular, group, or home-based and which do not disrupt the regular functions, leaders monitor and evaluate their own learning Very Satisfactory progress through the conduct of three 3 need-based professional 4 development initiatives to enhance strengths and address performance Quality.

Efficiency personnel Satisfactory Conducted two 2 need-based professional development initiatives to 3 enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school Unsatis factory personnel Conducted one 1 need-based professional development initiative to 2 enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school Poor personnel No acceptable evidence presented 1 4.

Provided opportunities September 6. SLAC Outstanding 2. Job Rotations 5. Benchmarking 6. Coaching and Mentoring. Developed and supported personal and professional development of Efficiency. Very Satisfactory individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities 4 in the conduct of any five 5 of the identified HRD initiatives. Developed and supported personal and professional development of Satisfactory individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities 3 in the conduct of any four 4 of the identified HRD initiatives.

Implemented a school September 6. Creation of Rewards and Recognition Committee Outstanding 3. Selection of applicants 5 4. Development of selection criteria per category 5. Sourcing of funds for prizes 6. Satisfactory Conducted at least three 3 of the identified activities 3 Unsatis factory Conducted at least two 2 of the identified activities 2 Poor Conducted at least one 1 of the identified activities 1 5.

Built constructive September 6. Occasionally built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues, Satisfactory parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive 3 environment for learners Rarely built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues, parents Unsatis factory and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive environment 2 for learners Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 Outstanding Conducted at least 7 activities with parents and other stakeholders across 5 four quarters with complete required documents.

Conducted at least activities with parents and other stakeholders Very Satisfactory across four quarters with complete required documents. Satisfactory Conducted at least activities with parents and other stakeholders 3 across four quarters with complete required documents. Communicated September 6. Quality Occasionally communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive use of Satisfactory communication platform to facilitate information sharing, collaboration and 3 support.

Rarely communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive use of Basic Education Services. Unsatis factory communication platform to facilitate information sharing, collaboration and 2 support.

Poor No acceptable evidence 1 presented Accomplished, created and utilized five 5 of the following communication platforms: 1.

SMS 2. Initiated partnerships September 6. Very Satisfactory Provided partnership evidences to strengthen support for learner development and school and community improvement Efficiency. Plus Factor Performed related tasks 2.

Conducted at least one 1 relevant research in any area within the rating period;. Efficiency 6. Conducted innovation to address learning gaps; Outstanding 7. Member of district and higher level QA team 9. Ratee Rater Approving Authority. Outstanding 4. Memo 2. Minutes 3. Photo Documentation 4. Attendance Sheets 5. Proof of Distribution of Print Materials Outstanding 6. Screenshots of Online Announcement 5 7. Tarpaulin 8. Letter Request for Radio Timeslot stamped “Received” 9. Link of Video Clips Efficiency.

Letter of Invitation to Stakeholders stamped “Received”. Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 1. Developed and Presence of the listed MOVs: implemented with the 1. Copy of approved AIP planning team school plans 2.

Accomplishment Report with documentation signed by the School Project aligned with institutional Management Team PMT noted by the school head goals and policies 3. Terms of reference indicating stakeholders leadership role in the AIP Quality. Utilized available 1. List of SIP Monitoring team; achievement 3. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP; 4. Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to Outstanding improve the plan; 5 5.

Mid-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports; 6. Documentations with pictures showing the stakeholders as the lead facilitators in the reviewing and improving the Development Plan e. List of SIP Monitoring team; 3.

Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to 4 improve the plan; 5. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP; 3 4. Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to improve the plan; 5.

Mid-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP; 2 4. Approved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP; Poor 3. Summary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments to 1 improve the plan; 4.

Wash in School WinS rating 3. School eSAT summary first and fourth phases 5. Generated acknowledgment receipt of the Uploaded SMEA Report per quarter 5 for discussion during the orientation re generating the report 8. LR Reports Offline Reports: 1. Quality 2. SF4 3. Updated School Form 7. Very Satisfactory Absence of one 1 to two 2 evidences of required reports 4 Satisfactory Absence of three 3 to four 4 evidences of required reports 3.

Unsatis factory Absence of five 5 to six 6 evidences 2 Basic Education Services. Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 At least five 5 evidences of both online and offline learners and school reports: 1. Outstanding LIS 2. EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS 5. At least 3 evidences of both online and offline learners and school reports: 1. At least 2 evidences of both online and offline learners and school reports: 1. Poor No acceptable evidence presented 1 Outstanding Submitted all the reports on or before the deadline 5 Very Satisfactory Submitted one 1 to two 2 evidences of reports after the deadline 4 Timeliness.

Satisfactory Submitted three 3 to four 4 evidences of reports after the deadline 3 Submitted five 5 to six 6 evidences of reports after the deadline Unsatis factory 2. Managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and issuances in allocation, procurement, Presence of all of the listed MOVs: disbursement and 1.

PTA audited financial report signed by the president, treasurer and auditor with attached proof of expenses 3. Financial report on Alumni association 3. Financial report on school produce 3. Financial report on Brigada Eskwela donations with deed of donations 4. Managed school Presence of all of the following evidences: facilities and equipment in 1. Annual Inventory report of school facilities adherence to policies, 1. Books and other learning materials 2. Inventory of Books 2. Inventory of LGs 2.

Inventory of IMs Outstanding 3. List of Donations 5 3. School Facilities 3. Books and other learning materials 4. Presence of segregated waste facilities 7. Functional health facilities 8. Logbook of utilization of school equipment 9. Site Development Plan Assisted teachers in a. Mega School — at least 20 standards to make the b. Large School — at least 16 curriculum relevant for the Outstanding b.

Medium School — at least 12 learners 5 b. Small School — at least 8 c. District stamped TA reports narrative report, pictures, samples showing TA provision.

Mega School — at least 16 Very Satisfactory b. Large School — at least 12 4 b. Medium School — at least 8 b. Small School — at least 4 c. Quality a. Mega School — at least 12 b.

Large School — at least 8 Satisfactory b. Medium School — at least 4 3 b. Small School — at least 2 c. District stamped TA reports narrative report, pictures, samples. Mega School — at least 8 Unsatis factory b. Large School — at least 4 2 b. Medium School — at least 2 b. Small School — only 1 c. District stamped TA reports narrative report, pictures, samples Poor Absence of any of the non negotiable indicators 1 Presence of all of the following: 1.

Contextualized Curriculum Matrix per learning area 4. Inventory of localized and indigenized teaching and learning materials 5. Evaluation Tools for localized Learning Resources 7. Record of utilization of downloaded materials from the LR portal Outstanding 8. Record of the quality assured locally-developed LRs utilized at the school, 5 district, division level 9. Monitoring report of the of the localized curriculum Presence of MOV 1 to 6 Satisfactory 3.

Utilized learning 1. Availability of CGs, TGs. LMs, etc. Supervisory Plan, Instructional Supervision Report 6. Intervention Reports e. Report of Participation of students and teachers in activities outside the school Documentation that the school has been benchmarked Logbook, Letter of Appreciation, etc. Copy of agreement form signed by the SH and teacher, sample of validated consistent with curriculum contextualized assessment tool. Accomplished COT accountability in achieving a.

Mega School — 8 per quarter higher learning outcomes b. Large School — 6 per quarter c. Self- edits words, numbers, phonetic notation and content, if necessary. Printers, modems, multimedia projectors, etc. Prepares simple presentation using Powerpoint.

Utilizes technologies to: access information to enhance professional productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local and global professional networks. Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity and professional practice.

Superior Signature Signature. Open navigation menu. Close suggestions Search Search. User Settings. Skip carousel. Carousel Previous. Carousel Next. What is Scribd? Explore Ebooks. Bestsellers Editors’ Picks All Ebooks. Explore Audiobooks. Bestsellers Editors’ Picks All audiobooks. Explore Magazines. Editors’ Picks All magazines. Explore Podcasts All podcasts. Difficulty Beginner Intermediate Advanced. Explore Documents.

Uploaded by Felynar Gasang. Did you find this document useful? Is this content inappropriate? Report this Document. Flag for inappropriate content. Download now. Jump to Page. Search inside document. Competence Human Resources. Revised Opcrfs for Htprincipals Action Plan Drrm. Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. Brigada Eskwela Steering and working Committee. Yes Please. Annual Implementation Plan.

Learning Delivery Modality-Implementation-Plan. Principles: Life and Work. Fear: Trump in the White House. The World Is Flat 3. The Outsider: A Novel. SSIP sample. The Handmaid’s Tale. The Alice Network: A Novel. Life of Pi.

The Perks of Being a Wallflower. Manhattan Beach: A Novel. Little Women. COaching and Mentoring Form. A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. Sing, Unburied, Sing: A Novel. Gap Analysis Template. Everything Is Illuminated. The Constant Gardener: A Novel. Ab Initio Guide